A. 51,289,320 won, Plaintiff B, C, and F respectively, and Plaintiff D and E 812,500 won, respectively;

A. The name of the project, such as the recognition and announcement of the project: V housing redevelopment and improvement project - the project implementer: Defendant - The name of the administrative district of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City was changed to the Incheon Metropolitan City Michuhol-gu on August 8, 2016.

W Public Notice)

B. Decision on the expropriation by the Incheon Metropolitan City Local Land Expropriation Committee on September 19, 2018 - Subject to expropriation: The owners of the Plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, F, and X-M buildings in Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City died on November 29, 201, and the Plaintiff B, C, and F inherited each of the above real estate 1/4 shares, Plaintiff D, and E, respectively.

G, H, I, J, K, K, L, M, N, andO - Loss compensation - The amount stated in the separate sheet 1 in attached Table 1 “amount of adjudication” - The date of commencement of expropriation: November 13, 2018 - AA and AB

(c) Decision on expropriation on November 28, 2018 of the Incheon Metropolitan City Local Land Expropriation Committee - Object of expropriation: The amount stated in the column for "amount of adjudication on expropriation" in attached Table 2 of the attached Table 2 owned by the Plaintiff P, Q, R, S, T, U - Compensation for losses: Each amount stated in the attached Table 2 of the date of commencement of expropriation - An appraisal corporation: AC and AD corporation.

D. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on July 25, 2019 - Compensation for loss: The amount stated in Schedule 1 and Table 2 in “the amount of adjudication” - The appraisal corporation: AE, AF (Objection to the Ruling on Expropriation of the above Paragraph (b) above), AG, AH (AH).

(1) The court shall decide on an objection against the ruling to admit

E. Appraisal of this Court - The amount stated in the column for "court appraisal amount" in attached Tables 1 and 2 - An appraiser: The fact that there is no dispute over AI (based for recognition), Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, Gap evidence Nos. 2, and 6-1 through 11, Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 8-5, the result of the appraisal commission to the appraiser AI of this Court, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s defense prior to the merits was as follows: Plaintiff P and Q against the Defendant, as Incheon District Court 2019Guhap 53376.