beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.10 2014가합8024

대여금반환

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 212,50,000 as well as 30% per annum from November 1, 201 to July 15, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of each claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff is the defendant, ① 30,00,000 won on February 13, 2009, ② 55,000,000 won on March 23, 2009 and April 23, 2009, ③ 25,000,000 won on April 30, 2009, ④ 10,000,000 won on September 15, 200, ⑤ 10,000,000 won on June 30, 2010, and ④ 60,000,00 won on August 16, 200, and 205, the loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's loan's remainder.

In other words, the above (1) The borrower is C, and the above (2) the borrower is D, and the above (4) the borrower is E, and the above (5) the borrower of the loan is F, and the above (6) the borrower of the loan is G, and the defendant was only the broker who arranged the plaintiff to lend money to C, etc.

In addition, in the case of the above-mentioned loans, the amount that the Plaintiff actually lent to C is KRW 20 million, and the amount that the Plaintiff actually lent to E in the case of the above-mentioned loans is KRW 70 million.

B. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as to whether the defendant is the borrower or not, the plaintiff transferred KRW 20,000,000 from the plaintiff's deposit account of the National Bank on February 13, 2009 to the defendant's agricultural bank account on February 13, 2009, and ② the defendant borrowed KRW 30,000,000 on February 13, 2009 as above with the money transferred from the plaintiff on February 13, 2009.