However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 8, 2013, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving vehicle B. On the other hand, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 30km per hour from the boundary of the Ulsan Science and Technology University at a speed of 30km per hour, depending on the two-lane road in front of the East-dong defense station in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan National Science and Technology University.

Since the place is where a central line is installed, a driver engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the motor vehicle at the front time and to safely operate the motor vehicle in compliance with the order of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the front wheel part of the vehicle, which is driven by the injured party C(32 years of age) who is driven by the opposite vehicle line, to the front wheel part of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the depression and alleys, which require approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. The police report (1), (2);

1. Photographs related to accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Since the probation and order to attend a training course was seriously injured by an accident that intrudes the central line of the reason for sentencing under the proviso to Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a imprisonment without prison labor due to the occurrence of an accident, but the agreement was reached smoothly with the victim, only before a fine is imposed, and the risk of recidivism is recognized, taking into account the fact that the execution of a sentence was 15 years prior to the previous one, etc., the probation and compliance