When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The court shall correct ex officio some of the facts charged to the extent that the identity of the facts charged is recognized based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated, and it does not disadvantage the defendant's defense right.

[Power of crime] On September 24, 2020, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on Drinking) to the Suwon Flag Flag.

[2] On August 24, 2020, the Defendant driven a Dcona car from around 2 km to the front road of Yong-si, Gosi-si, Gosi-si, Gosi-si, and after drinking alcohol on August 25, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.112% during the suspension period of the driver's license on the front road of Young-gu, Young-gu, Gung-gu, Young-si, Gung-si. The Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 1m during the suspension period of the driver's license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in the main place, investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver who is placed in the main place), and notification of the results of

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. A previous conviction: Application of a written inquiry, a summary written indictment, and the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 subparag. 1, Article 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 17371 of Jun. 9, 2020), Article 152 subparag. 1, and Article 43 of each Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of driving without a license)

1. Selection of a fine, respectively, provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (only between the crimes of violation of the Traffic Act by a person on August 25, 2020 and the crimes of violation of the Traffic Act by a person on August 25, 202)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant, on June 2020, was found to have driven the instant drinking without permission at the same time during two months, even though he was found to have driven a drinking around June 202, and the instant drinking was caused by the contact accident.