However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle with soflurt from B.

On February 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car along the two-lane road in front of the D farm located in Seopopo City C on February 15:41, 2017, and proceeded from the direction of Spo-si to Seopo-si in front of the D farm.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the vehicle, such as taking the front left and left well, accurately operating the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded as it was, while driving by the victim E who was stopped under the subparagraph 1 of the suspension at the front direction of the defendant's proceeding.

F) The back portion of the F Radon car conflict with the front part of the F Radon car which the defendant was driving.

Defendant: (a) due to such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E (hereinafter “victim”); (b) the victim G (36) who is a passenger of the said radar, caused the injury of the rash by the rash, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the rash that requires treatment for about two weeks; and (c) at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the rash car owned by the victim E to take necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the 966,656 won, such as exchanging the back rasher; and (d) attempted to escape without taking necessary measures, such as examining the degree of injury of the victim, and providing relief.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Each written diagnosis (E, G);

1. Written estimate for repair of damaged vehicles;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements of victim E and hear statements of victim G);

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the point of escape after the injury from duty) and Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of non-measures after the accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.