However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 12. 14. 05:10 경 군산시 구 암 3.1로 82에 있는 군산 경찰서 정문 입초 앞에서, 술에 취하여 찾아와 근무자 의무경찰 일경 C에게 시비를 걸며 행패를 부리던 중, 위 경찰서 상황실 당직근무 중이 던 피해자 경위 D로부터 귀가할 것을 권유 받자 기분이 나쁘다는 이유로 욕설을 하고 주먹과 발로 위 경찰관의 얼굴 부위와 허벅지 부위를 수회 때리고, 이를 제지하는 위 C의 허벅지 부위를 발로 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the above police officers' legitimate performance of their duties on duty in the situation room and police station protection duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to D and C;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;

The reason for sentencing [Scope of Recommendation] Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (a person with a special mitigation) in the mitigation area (one month to eight months) (a person with a special mitigation), six months of imprisonment with labor for the mitigation area (a decision of sentence).