손해배상(자)
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. Even if the allegations by the parties concerned and the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are closely examined, it does not seem that there was any error in the findings and judgment of the first instance court.
Therefore, the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written or added as follows, and therefore, they are cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In addition, "related" and "2014......" shall be added to "the representative of the principal and the rest of the plaintiffs" between "related" and "2014.
On behalf of the plaintiff in the third 9th of the judgment of the first instance court, the "Plaintiff C" was replaced by "the plaintiff C himself and the remaining plaintiffs' representatives."
Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be 16 as follows.
“B. At the time of the agreement in this case, the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” in the 3th 20th 20th 1st am of the first instance judgment was written.
In addition, the following contents shall be added between 4, 10 and 11 of the judgment of the first instance:
Inasmuch as the aforementioned legal principles as to the validity of the “agreement on the Waiver of Claim for Damages”, the agreement to bring a lawsuit for the compensation of damages due to the occurrence of legacy that the victim could not have anticipated at the time of the agreement shall be deemed not effective (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 98Da63988, Mar. 26, 1999; 70Da1284, Aug. 31, 1970). According to the first instance judgment of the first instance court, the “1, 2-1, 3-2” in Section 4-11 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court of “No. 4, 3-1, 3-1, 3-12 (including the number of pages).”
In the fourth 16th 2th 10th 16th 2th 201, the term "aftermath" shall be changed to "aftermath disability".
On the fourth 19th 19th 10th 1st 1st 1st 201, this Court shall be applied to "the first 1st 2th 1st
2. In conclusion, the conclusion of the first instance judgment is legitimate, and thus, the plaintiffs.