If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Defendant

A On March 5, 2016, around 15:55, 2016, 200 women non-nameed 15:20 women were allowed to drive a cub motor vehicle in B, a corporate vehicle of Defendant A, and they were on the top of the cubic cubic cubic cubic cubic cubic cubic cubic cubic cubs in front of the entrance of the Hongpo

C Operation D-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wnn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn

Accordingly, Defendant A sent a telephone to Defendant E who is 35 years of age or older, and “A traffic accident has occurred while driving a company car, which is 35 years of age or older, is caused by a limited driving special contract for automobile insurance.” In fact, Defendant A false statement was made to the employee of the victim company “EA driver” even though 20 women who are the subject of exemption from insurance application of Cubs car in the above case are driving.

In addition, E made a false call from a victim company's staff member, and “In the Republic of Korea, while driving a Kusa car above the above, it caused an accident.”

The Defendant and E received KRW 11,716,470 in total from the victim company around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant and E were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation ( driver C’s oral hearing);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;