When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 6, 2019, at around 13:07, the Defendant found the head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building D, a residence of the victim B, and took a bath, and caused the victim to open the door door to the front door, and prevented the victim from entering the front door, and assaulted the part of the victim's left part and the part of the arms above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of B’s statutory statement law

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Although the defendant's criminal facts are clear of the reasons for sentencing under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs, he/she does not oppose his/her mistake while denying the crime of this case.

Considering this point, since the amount of fine for a summary order already issued cannot sufficiently achieve the purpose of punishment against the defendant, the fine shall be increased based on Article 457-2 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the cost of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant, and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.