[2013 Highest 4630] On November 27, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on November 27, 2008 and completed the execution of the sentence on October 19, 2009.

On February 1, 2011, the Defendant stated that “I will have the victim B (old 34 years of age) obtain a loan from the former president, and C would have the incumbent member of the Franchisium receive a loan without the framework of the appraisal and loan fee.”

However, in fact, the defendant is not the former president, but C also did not have the intention or ability to provide the loan.

Nevertheless, the defendant makes a false statement as above, and 3 million won on the same day under the name of appraisal fee and loan fee from the victim, and the same month.

7. A total of KRW 14 million, including KRW 2 million, KRW 3 million around the 16th day of the same month, KRW 3 million on the 17th day of the same month, and KRW 3 million on the 14 million on the 17th day of the same month, and acquired it by deception.

[2014 Highest 800] The Defendant, in collusion with D, knew that the victim E would want to obtain a project fund as collateral for the F land in Namyang-si, Namyang-si (hereinafter “Namyang-si real estate”), intended to obtain a large amount of a loan by raising appraisal from the victim, and had the victim obtain a large amount of the loan. In order to acquire money under the pretext of appraisal expenses, loan fees, etc.

On December 4, 2012, at the H office in the management of the victim’s 816 Guri-si, the Defendant stated that “B is an appraisal-related expert.” The Defendant changed the amount of KRW 3 million with the starting fee to receive a high appraisal price on the real estate within the Republic of Korea.” On February 2, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “D calls for the victim at an unclaimed place to receive an appraisal report, and sent KRW 5 million as it is necessary to receive an appraisal report.”

However, even if the defendant and D received money from the victim, they did not have any intention or ability to get the victim to obtain high-priced appraisal of the remaining real estate.

After all, the defendant and D.