When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the Dong representative, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, 103 apartment complex C.

The victim D(W. 59) is a family-based representative of the Seo-gu Daejeon 116 Dong-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon on July 1, 2014, who has been in charge of a general director-general office of the C Apartment's representative meeting from July 1, 2016 to the date.

1. On August 23, 2016, the Defendant, located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on August 23, 2016, displayed the victim’s Da and body, on the ground that the occupant representative conference room at the resident representative conference at the C Apartment Management Office, did not fit the opinion, and threatened the victim, “I will not keep the victim in mind,” and “I would go through the night road,” and “I would go through the night road.”

2. The defendant has committed the same harm;

9. On 22. 20:00, at the same place as above, at around 20:0, in the process of a representative meeting of occupants, “V” was made by creating “V due to recognition and suspension of recognition by the victim and by hand, on the ground that the opinion does not coincide with the opinion, and was threatening the victim by continuing to see the galle as close as the snow is close as the victim suffered, and by continuing to see the galle, “hing the snow,” and by threatening the victim by doing so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (as at the second public trial date);

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant did not threaten the victim as stated in the facts charged of the instant case.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances, i.e., the victim, from the investigative agency to this court, is underway.