A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for two years, respectively.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Defendant

B After entering into a partnership agreement with the owner F of the land and the multi-family house built on the land at Pyeongtaek-si E (hereinafter “studio in this case”), the actual owner of the building in charge of the construction of the building at issue is a public intermediary in charge of the sale of the studio building at the request of the defendant B.

Defendant

B In the process of the construction of the studio in this case, while the F did not change the obligation under the name of F with the payment of a large amount of money for the said land and the instant studio as collateral, the F’s application was initiated on April 10, 2015 by the F’s creditor G, and the voluntary auction procedure for the instant studio and the instant studio were initiated on April 10, 2015 with the F’s application by the F’s creditor, and the F’s application by the F’s creditor, the studio and the instant auction procedure on the instant studio were commenced at the same court first, in collusion with the Defendant A, to forge the documents related to the instant studio construction in the name of the building owner and submit them to the auction court for the report of false lien and

1. On August 9, 2015, the Defendants of the forgery of private documents conspired to use a computer in a place where it is unknown at a time from August 2015 to August 9, 201, to pay KRW 310 million, excluding KRW 50 million, which was paid on July 31, 2012, excluding KRW 310,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won by July 31, 2012.

On July 5, 2012, one copy of the payment of "F, E, and E, E, the owner of each letter," and "Building F, the owner of each building," did not pay construction cost of KRW 310 million to A, who is a structural construction and a stone construction business operator, and A is in possession of J building 404.