When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 28, 2019, the Defendant had done as if he would normally pay the cost of maintenance at C-Motor vehicle mechanic located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and had four wheels of D-5 vehicles with their own wheels and Aluminium chairs replaced, and the victim E, the representative of D-5 vehicle mechanic, who has completed the replacement and maintenance of the request, would immediately pay the cost online.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to make a normal settlement of typhos, wheel replacement and maintenance costs.

As above, the Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 1,400,000 from the method of receiving maintenance after being replaced by a wheel with a vehicle on credit by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Photographs of vehicles at the scene of maintenance, each investigation report, and application of statutes to work instruction;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [Incompetence] The defendant has a record of having been sentenced to a fine several times as a crime of fraud (negative] that the damaged amount is a small amount, and reflects the fact that the damaged amount is a small amount.