2. Although the judgment of the court below is favorable to the confession of the crime of this case, the defendant committed the crime of this case again without being aware that he was sentenced to a fine twice due to the same kind of crime, the defendant has employed a foreigner who has no status of sojourn for a long time, the crime of this case must be eradicated as an act that may cause harm to the foreigner's immigration control, and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and method of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, etc. are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.