beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.06.27 2019고단1182

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2017, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim B: (a) at the “D’s clothes store operated by the Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si, the first floor of the Victim B, the Defendant: (b) “The Defendant 10,00,000 won in the first floor and gains a lot of profits; (c) the Defendant 10,000 won in the first floor; (d) it is difficult for the new husband to perform the Amph; (b) there is a concern for the Defendant to do the Amph; and (d) it is said that the Defendant would have made an investment with the money less than the Pmph; and (d) 30,000 to 40% of the principal of the principal of the Plaintiff in November of the Republic of Korea.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was planned to use the money received from the victim for personal expenses, and there was no intention or ability to pay the proceeds promised to the victim even if the victim received money from the victim, since the Defendant did not raise the amount of money in the above E.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 2,50,000 won from the victim’s G bank account (H) in the name of F on July 5, 2017, and 2,500,000 won from the same account on July 27, 2017.

2. On December 2017, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim I stated to the effect that, “K” in the soupbry office located in the Sungwon-si J of Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, would make up for the victim I the victim I “I am L, which you have ear, and you have home.” The amount of KRW 10,000,000 is KRW 10,000 on one unit, and the amount of KRW 20,000 may be invested from March to April, 3 to April, 200, based on the amount of investment. The amount of principal may be brought up for a few months, and thus, an investment would be prejudicial to the extent of its principal.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was planned to use the money received from the victim for personal expenses, and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount to the victim even if he received money from the victim.