2. The judgment is based on the following facts: although it is recognized that the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant had three identical criminal records, including the two identical criminal records, and the amount obtained by deception was about 80,000,000 won in total, and there was no substantial portion of the recovery of damage; some victims want to be punished by the defendant; it is a crime during the repeated crime period due to the crime of this paper; it is the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the crime; circumstances after the crime; and all other matters concerning the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the judgment of the court below is reasonable, and thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.