However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant: (a) around March 11, 2015, went to the front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu, and (b) around the rear side of DKa car, which is the ownership of the victim B parked there; and (c) went to the front of the DKa car.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's registration number plate.

2. The same year after attaching the motor vehicle registration number plate stolen to the motor vehicle owned by the defendant on March 2015, at the seat of the defendant's dwelling located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Patrol on the ground of his/her unlawful use of air defense, unlawful use of air defense, unlawful use of air defense, and violation of the Automobile Management Act to the motor vehicle without

4. By the 17th day, the car was operated.

Accordingly, the defendant used the air sign registration number plate illegally for the purpose of exercising the right, and exercised the air defense illegally used.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing crimes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 329 of the Criminal Act; Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the Automobile Management Act; Article 71 (1) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act (Unlawful Use of Motor Vehicle Registration Number Plate);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (the crime of unlawful use of air in the market and the crime of violating the Automobile Management Act shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor prescribed by a crime of violating the Automobile Management Act with heavier punishment);

1. Theft of punishment and selection of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Automobile Management Act as stated in the judgment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 333(1) of the Refund Criminal Procedure Act [the scope of recommending punishment] The criteria for dealing with multiple crimes that have no basic area (6-1-6 months) (6-1-6 months) of category 2 (general larceny) for general property: the larceny for which the sentencing criteria are set and the sentencing criteria are set.