2. The crime of this case was committed without being aware of the fact that the defendant was glickly, and thus, it is not good that the crime of this case was committed by assaulting two victims, and that it was not agreed with the victims up to now, that the defendant had a record of being punished several times for the same crime, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case even though he was during the period of repeated crime due to a separate crime

However, considering the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant repents his mistake and reflects against himself, the fact that he does not repeat the crime, and the degree of injury of the victims (in need of treatment for 7 days each), the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, the circumstances and result of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions in this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, and thus, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.