However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Breach of trust;

A. On August 2013, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C: (a) KRW 12 million, organized at the Defendant’s home located at the time of the Government of the Republic of Korea around August 2013; (b) KRW 500,000,00 (the amount of interest, KRW 12 million,000,000,000,000 per month from the 3rd fraternity to the 500,000 won per month; and (c) monthly payment, “one million,” when based on the statement made by the victim and the Defendant to the investigation agency; and (d) such correction is made in writing as “12 million,” and “5 million,” respectively.

fakes

It is the direction of the number system with 21 unit of Gu.

On April 30, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 11,80,000 from the members of the fraternity at a non-permanent place on April 30, 2015, and thus, the Defendant had a duty to pay KRW 11,80,000 to the victims of the fraternity C, which was designated as the recipient of the fraternity on the same day.

Nevertheless, on May 2015, the Defendant spent 7.8 million won in personal debt repayment, etc. without paying the remainder of KRW 7.8 million except for the 4 million paid to the victim by the first police officer.

As a result, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the above amount and sustained damages equivalent to the same amount as the victim.

B. On April 2014, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E and F: (a) KRW 10 million (interest, KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000 organized at the above Defendant’s home (hereinafter “1,00,000,000 won”) was deemed to be a clerical error in the “670,000,000 won” when making a statement to the victim and the Defendant’s investigative agency; and (b) thus, correction is made.

fakes

It is the direction of the number system with 16 units of the Gu.

On May 25, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 11,200,00 from the members of the fraternity at a non-permanent place on May 25, 2015, and thus, on the same day, there was a duty to pay KRW 14,00,000 to the Plaintiff E and F.

Nevertheless, the defendant violated his duty and consumed the above fraternity in the repayment of his personal debt without paying the above fraternity.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the above amount and sustained damages equivalent to the same amount to the victims.

2. The Defendant is guilty.