beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.22 2016가단58798

소유권이전등기

Text

1. Defendant B and D shall return to the Plaintiff unjust enrichment with respect to their respective 330.6/2387 square meters of forest E in Jeju-si.

Reasons

The grounds for the indication of the judgment on the claim against the defendant B and D are as shown in the attached Form.

The applicable provisions of law: The Plaintiff, in Jeju City, purchased E forest land 2687 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the share of 330.6/2687 out of the instant land as collateral, and thereafter, the Plaintiff returned the investment amount to Defendant C. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff is liable to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the ground of unjust enrichment return with respect to the share of 330.6/2687 out of the instant land.

The purpose of the registration of ownership transfer for the land of this case by Defendant C was to secure.

or the Plaintiff returned the investment money to Defendant C.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to acknowledge or recognize it.

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B and D is justified, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is dismissed as it is without merit.