If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On September 24, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:50 on September 24, 2013, and moved back the side road 964-6 in order to deduct the vehicle from the parking place at the parking place.

Since the wing-wing vehicle volume of the victim D(34 years old) driving was stopped at the aftermast, there was a duty to pay attention to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the vehicle in the right and right and right and right and right and right and right and right and right and duty and duty and duty and duty and duty and duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and caused the above part of the vehicle under consideration of the negligence of the defendant, which led to the above part of the vehicle under consideration.

Ultimately, if the Defendant had a certain part of repair costs equivalent to approximately KRW 380,000, such as a driver after the damaged vehicle due to the foregoing traffic accident, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without any necessary measures such as removal of traffic obstacles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant at the court (the second trial date);

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs, on-site photographs, and photographs of respective damaged vehicles;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;