beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고단6522

사기방조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 3, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for special larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and was released on October 28, 2009 and the parole period expired on January 2, 2010.

1. C and D in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act established a corporation as D’s representative, opened an account under the name of the corporation, and offered money by transferring passbooks, cash cards, security cards for Internet banking, etc. to the Defendant. On November 28, 2012, E and A (hereinafter “E”) registered as a corporation’s representative at the Namgu Tax Office located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Inc. (hereinafter “F, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, G 203, Jeju-do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do-si,”) and opened one bank account (hereinafter “E”) in the name of the E-bank at the Suwon-dong branch located in Suwon-dong, Daegu-dong, and around December 3, 2012.

No person shall transfer or acquire the means of access in using and managing the means of electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, around December 3, 2012, the Defendant received from Kwikset service a passbook, cash card, and security card for Internet banking opened in the name of Kwikset from Kwikset (Account H) prior to the Kwikset point of Kwikset, and again transfers the means of access for electronic financial transactions to Kwikset, thereby taking over and transferring the means of access for electronic financial transactions. In addition, as indicated in the column for opening an account in the separate sheet of crime crimes, the Defendant transferred 22 means of access, such as a passbook in the name of a corporation established with D as its representative from November 28, 2012 to December 12, 2012, and transferred it again to I.

3. If the Defendant acquired a passbook, etc. from C and transferred it to I again, the Defendant would have received it from I or I, and then I would have received it again from I or I, the Defendant would have received it again.