However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 6, 2014, at around 05:50 on May 6, 2014, the Defendant, at the “E” point operated by the victim D (n, 40 years of age) in Ulsan-gu C, for the reason that the victim was able to complete his/her business, while drinking alcohol, he/she saw the victim’s face while drinking alcohol to the victim, and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of four copies of violence against the victim and on-site photographs of the victim;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning a crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not easy in light of the following: (a) the mitigation area (Habitual, Habitual, Habitual, and Special Violence) (4-1-2) and the mitigation area (special mitigation) [specific mitigation] and the majority of the criminal records of violence (decision of sentence]; (b) the punishment is not easy; (c) but erroneous recognition and reflects; (d) the victim has repeatedly sought the Defendant’s wife by committing the crime against the victim; and (e) the sentencing factors indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age,