beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.06.11 2020고단303

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 2019 to September 1, 2019, the Defendant damaged the entrance door that the victim managed by the vehicle due to the discovery of the entrance knife part on the ground that the Plaintiff did not open the entrance, while under the influence of alcohol from around August 2019 to around September 2019.

2. On October 6, 2019, the Defendant, at the same place as the preceding paragraph on October 6, 2019, committed assaulting the chest part of the above F, which was the chest part of the Defendant, by breaking B into the patrol vehicle to listen to the statements of the reporter B, in order to listen to the statements of the reporter B, and attempted to move to the E area, and intending to go to the patrol lane where the defective B was aboard.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. B written statements;

1. Reports on occurrence of a crime;

1. The degree of damage caused by the crime of destroying the reason for sentencing of C Apartment CCTVs, collected evidence images, and damaged photograph pictures is not so big, the defendant appears to obstruct the performance of police officers' duties by contingency while under the influence of alcohol, the victims do not want punishment against the defendant, the victims did not have any record of the same crime, and the defendants are divided into their errors, and all sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On October 6, 2019, the summary of this part of the facts charged received 112 reports stating that the Defendant continued to open the entrance on the grounds that he was found in the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seoul metropolitan apartment D, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and that he did not open the entrance.