beta
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2016.01.28 2014가합2885

소유권이전등기

Text

1. DefendantO received KRW 82,593,00 from Plaintiff K, and at the same time Plaintiff K receive KRW 82,593,00.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties to the contract is the rental business operator of Q apartment (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”). The plaintiffs are the lessees of each real estate listed in the separate sheet among the above apartment of this case (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”), and the rest of the defendants except the defendant Seocho-do (hereinafter “the defendants purchaser”) purchase the real estate of this case from the defendant Seocho-do and acquire the ownership thereof.

B. The plaintiffs and the defendant Sho-do rental business operator of the apartment of this case entered into a lease agreement with the lessee who applied for occupancy on a first-come first-served basis from April 2002. The plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the lessee from April 15, 2002 with regard to each of the instant apartment of this case. The plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the period of lease from November 15, 2002 to five years. 2) on August 29, 2007, the defendant Sho-do purchased the instant apartment from the Kho-real estate trust and succeeded to the status of the rental business operator of the Kho-do real estate trust. On November 30, 2007, the registration of the ownership transfer of the instant apartment of this case was completed.

3) After that, on December 28, 2007, Defendant Western Pream entered into a new lease agreement that extends the term of the above lease to November 15, 2009 with the Plaintiffs, the term of the lease of which expires. (c) Defendant Western Pream made a public announcement of the preferential sale conversion of the apartment of this case and the purchase of the apartment ownership by Defendant purchaser of the apartment of this case (Defendant Pho Pho Pho Pho Phoh), Defendant Phoh applied for approval for the conversion of the apartment of this case to a female Phoh City Mayor around October 201, and the leisure market approved the conversion of the apartment of this case to 1,155 households, including the Plaintiffs, among apartment 1,392 households on October 12, 201 of the same year.

2. The defendant Western Pream Co., Ltd announced the tenant of the conversion of the sale in priority by setting the period of application for the conversion of the sale in lots around October 22, 2010.