We reverse the part on the violence.

Of the facts charged of this case, the injury is acquitted.

Before the judgment on the grounds for appeal of ex officio determination, the prosecutor applied for changes in the name of the defendant as "injury", "Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act" among applicable provisions of the Criminal Act as "Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act", and the part of the charges of assault in the charges as "the defendant was at the office of the victim C, located in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, Seoul, about 10:00 on March 27, 2012, the victim informed the victim accurately about D's private person and told the victim that he would know it well, and the part of the judgment of the court below as to the charges of assault in the charges was applied for changes to the victim's right side by hand, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment for the victim." Since the part of the judgment of the court below as to the charges of assault was changed by permitting it, the part of the judgment below as to the charges of assault was no longer maintained.

However, the prosecutor's assertion of misunderstanding the facts about intimidation is still subject to the judgment of this court, and this is examined below, even if there is such ground for ex officio reversal.

The judgment below

On August 13, 2012, the Defendant of this part of the facts charged against the assertion of mistake of facts as to intimidation is entitled to call from the G Hospital 451 room located in the G Hospital F on August 13, 2012 to his/her cell phone with the victim’s cell phone, and the Defendant is required to have ten persons.

The people are in the future.

It is called that he has died.

omans of those people.

The feas is the feas, where the feas is the feas, and the feasia is the feas.

Haba

(b) if any;