A. The Plaintiff supplied timber to C Co., Ltd., and the Defendant, the representative director of C Co., Ltd., issued a promissory note with the issuer C Co., Ltd. and the Defendant on December 17, 2012 in order to secure the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay the above timber price. On the same day, a notary public drafted a promissory note No. 1499 on the same day as D 2012.

B. On August 8, 2013, the Defendant drafted a written confirmation confirming the payment of KRW 156,906,684 of the amount of attempted bonds to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 57,423,645 won remaining 9,483,039 won with the exception of 57,423,645 won of the above claim amounting to 156,906,684 won, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as prescribed by the Civil Act from January 1, 2014 to February 14, 2020, the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, and 12% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.

As to this, the defendant was in a business trip overseas on the issuance date of the above Promissory Notes, it is not well aware of the reason for the issuance thereof.

Although the above promissory note was made by coercion, even if the defendant's assertion is based on the defendant's assertion, the defendant delivered the legal person and the individual seal impression to the plaintiff for the purpose of the notarial act of the account payable to the material and the above promissory note and the notarial deed to the extent that it was made by the plaintiff's coercion, and there is no evidence

Rather, according to the above evidence, it is only recognized that the Defendant prepared a document confirming the payment of unpaid materials even after preparing the said promissory note and notarial deed.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable and acceptable.