However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 21, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) committed an assault against the victim’s body by taking the victim’s ebbbbbbb and destroying the victim’s eb by hand on the front of the “C main point” located in B at 08:0 on February 21, 2018, on the ground that the victim D (18:3) assaulted the victim’s eb.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with E and F.

2. The Defendant, while assaulting D at the above date, at the above time, at a place, and during the performance of official duties, expressed his desire to “Ping year, she would be able to drink, she would be able to go to the victim H (the 30-year old age),” and the victim’s face side was inflicted on the victim once on about two (2) weeks.

Accordingly, the police officer interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the handling of reported cases by Defendant 112 and inflicted injury on the victim at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F, E, or D;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the photograph and diagnosis of the case

1. Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act related to the crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint assault) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of protection and the order of community service, have many records of having received juvenile protective disposition, but there is no record of criminal punishment, and this case.