beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2020.05.29 2019고정1307

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 21:30 on March 22, 2019, the Defendant and C met the above F with the victim F (the age of 55) who was the seat of the above F (the age of 55) who was the seat of the said F (hereinafter referred to as "pather son") and was a guest at the E main point in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul. Around 21:30, the Defendant and C met the above F with each other on the ground that the said F was living in Sungnam, on the ground that the Defendant stated that he “pather son is a sexual son,” and C went off the son of the above F (the age of 54) and tried to fight, one time in his hand, who was the driver of the said F (the age of 54).

이후 피고인은 이에 합세하여 위 G에게 다가가 그의 어깨를 손으로 밀치고, C은 위 G, 그의 일행인 피해자 H(56세)과 뒤엉켜 서로 밀고 당기며 몸싸움을 하는 과정에서 다리 부분으로 위 G의 옆구리를 찼다.

C continuedly, in the process of physical fighting, which was frightened with the horse in a state of being pushed over by himself in the middle of his spath, flabing the arms, flabing the face of the said H, and the Defendant flabed with the said F by combining it, flabing the flab and flabing the flab, and flabing the flab with the said G, and flabing the said G.

As a result, the Defendant jointly with C, carried out approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F, such as an internal morries, which require approximately six weeks of treatment to the victim G, and a morries that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim H, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of H, F, and G;

1. G statements;

1. Each investigation report (Submission of a written diagnosis of injury and CCTV inside the main station);

1. On-site and photographs of damaged parts;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that at the time of the instant case, the Defendant only told the victims to have a fluorous C to have a fluorous act, and that there was no conspiracy between C and the victim to have a fluorous act and that there was no injury.

Not less than two persons.