권리행사방해
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) entered into a contract with the victim’s employee E in the name of “C”; (b) under the name of the victim’s employee E who operated the delivery agency; (c) under the name of the victim’s employee E, the Defendant leased six Obane owned by the Defendant; and (d) entered into a contract for the supply of Obane lease with the victim to receive KRW 200,000,000 for each 26th anniversary of the said Oba; and (c) received KRW 100,000 from the victim to deliver the said Oba six Oba to the victim on April 2015; and (d) received the said one of the above Oba from the victim on the part of the victim.
On July 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 500,000,000,000,000 from the victim on June 6, 2015, and the remainder of KRW 500,000,00,000,000,000 from the victim would not pay the rent normally to the police officer on August 2015. The Defendant thought that the victim would not pay the rent normally, without notifying the victim to the victim.
Accordingly, around August 1, 2015, the Defendant discovered three oba in front of the “M” in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L, and brought three obaba in the cargo vehicle and brought three obaba to the “C” office.
Accordingly, the defendant took his own property, which is the object of the victim's rights, and obstructed the victim's exercise of rights.
2. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the judgment records, it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone did not notify the victim of the fact and brought the defendant to the date and time stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.
① The Defendant asserted that D did not pay KRW 500,000 and KRW 1,000,000,000,000, out of the rent for the six-month lease, and D was asserting that D paid all the rent including the on-site lease.