Defendants are not guilty of obstruction of the performance of official duties by fraudulent means.

1. Although a person who violates the Ship Personnel Act in Defendant B was prohibited from falsely proving his/her work experience on board the ship, the Defendant falsely proved his/her work experience on board the ship by means of preparing a certificate of work experience on board the ship’s seal imprint, as if he/she was on board the ship’s personnel during the above period, even though he/she did not board the ship at least one year from March 15, 201 to January 10, 201, as a ship’s personnel under the above E (7.93 tons) from March 15, 2011 to January 10, 2013.

2. Notwithstanding that those violating the Ship Personnel Act were not granted a marine officer license by fraud or other improper means, the Defendant received a marine officer license in an unlawful manner by submitting a false certificate as referred to in paragraph (1) at the request of the civil service offices of the Pohang-gu Office of the Port and Port Office located in the port and port of North Korea on January 14, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A copy of an application for renewal of a marine officer license and a certificate of work experience;

1. Application of statutes after inquiring about work experience A in the integrated ship access port management system of the Korea Coast Guard;

1. Article 27 subparagraph 1 of the Ship Personnel Act and Article 4 (Selection of Fine) Defendant B: Subparagraph 3 (Selection of Fine) of Article 27 of the Ship Personnel Act;

1. Defendant A to suspend the sentence: Fine of 300,000 won: fine of 100,000 won;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014) (each day, 100,000 won)

1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: The defense counsel on the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 59(1)(hereinafter referred to as the grounds for sentencing) of the Criminal Act is not a violation of the Ship Personnel Act, since it is difficult to view that Defendant A received a disposition to renew the license by means of insufficient examination by a public official in charge or by fraudulent or illegal means.