When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, a person who raises pigs 700 male in the name of “C,” and obtained a report on the installation of a livestock excreta discharge facility from around 2013 to emulation and viewing of livestock excreta. The installer of a livestock excreta discharge facility shall not discharge livestock excreta discharged from waste-generating facilities without discharging it into a disposal facility.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from June 2019 to December 23, 2019, did not flow about 10 tons of livestock excreta generated from the above farm into a disposal facility, and did not flow them into a disposal facility, so that the water produced by improper storage and discharge in the dry field B in ethical City flow out to the outside (river, water pipe), without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to business trips reports, on-site photographs, and written confirmation of violation;

1. Article 49 of the relevant Act on Criminal facts and subparagraph 2 of Article 49 of the Act on the Management and Use of Livestock Excreta Selection of Punishment and Article 10 (1) of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is to recognize and reflect all the errors of the defendant, and it is to not repeat again with an estimate to arrange a stable.

The punishment of a summary order shall be reduced by a certain number of fines in consideration of the defendant's age, criminal records, circumstances leading to the crime, etc.