If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person engaged in driving of a taxi belonging to DE.

On September 26, 2015, the Defendant driven the above taxi on September 03:12, 2015, and driven the road at a high level of private distance, which is located in the Mono-gu, Socheon-si, Seocheon-si, the Defendant proceeded from the KaTol University to the flue-dong at about 60km each hour, depending on one lane.

At the time, there is an intersection with a signal apparatus installed in the front section, so there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and comply with the signal for a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, and to thoroughly operate the steering and brake system accurately and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, while entering the intersection with the signal of the intersection being red, received the front part of the G taxi that the victim F(61) was driven by the victim F(3) who entered the intersection in accordance with normal signals from the right side of the course of the defendant's course due to the negligence of entering the intersection as is, without reducing the speed.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim F, such as salt pans, tensions, etc., in light of the following: (a) the victim H (V) who was the passenger aboard the Defendant’s taxi; (b) the victim H (V) was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment; (c) the victim I (V, 23 years of age); and (d) the victim I (V, 23 years of age) suffered injury, such as fluoral salt, etc., for which approximately two weeks of treatment is required.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, and preparation and report on recording notes;

1. Investigation report (No. 29 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 15 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, concerning criminal facts.