Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Defendant

A is the representative director of Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “B”), and Defendant B is an enterprise that mainly sells cosmetics in online electronic commerce, and sells food only a miscarriage product for food.

No one shall indicate or advertise any product under Article 13 (Prohibition of False Labeling, etc.) of the Food Sanitation Act, or any indication or advertisement that has the efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or that is likely to mislead or confuse such product as medicine or health functional foods.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인 A은 2015. 6. 11.경 서울 마포구 C빌딩 2층에 있는 자신이 운영하는 B에서 컴퓨터를 이용하여 온라인 전자상거래인 G마켓, 옥션, 11번가에 위 식품위생법 제13조에 위반하여 ‘미장건’이라는 제품을 표시ㆍ광고함에 있어 “메르스 면역, 메르스 예방, 피부미용에 좋다!!! 다이어트에도 좋다!!!”, 현미이야기라는 항목에는 “동맥경화, 암, 대장암등의 예방, 산모변비에 좋다 암 백내장 위험감소, 성장촉진, 암세포 억제 효과, 아토피 피부염개선, 신경질환예방, 각기병예방, 항신경염 작용” 등으로 오인ㆍ혼동할 우려가 있는 내용의 표시ㆍ광고를 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a charge (including attached documents);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 94(1)2-2 of the Food Sanitation Act, Article 13(1)1 of the Food Sanitation Act, the selection of fines

(b) Defendant B: Articles 100, 94(1)2-2, and 13(1)1 of the Food Sanitation Act

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;