난민불인정결정취소
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the court's decision to this case under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of
2. The Plaintiff asserts that “In Myanmar, the investigation of the work of the Union-based Government Soldiers (CNA) in Myanmar is currently underway, and the persons entered the military at the time of military administration, such as himself, do not wish to ensure safety, and may not return to Myanmar by using both the house and the property of the Republic of Korea, and, therefore, they need to be protected as a refugee.”
The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court were examined.
3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the conclusion, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.