When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 3, 2019, at around 23:19, the Defendant took a bath to the victim “D,” operated by the victim C (n, 50 years of age) at around 23:19, on the ground that there have been a large amount of drinking value, the Defendant took a wall for beer disease and beer disease and beer disease, and the victim took a bath to the victim “Iskh kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn k

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim and interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement C prepared by the police;

1. Photographs;

1. A report (fols) of occurrence (folishment) (folishment) (folishment) (folishment) of the Defendant asserts that the Defendant did not interfere with his duties by means of assaulting or brining the victim and breaking alcohol disease. On the day of the instant case, the Defendant appeared as a witness in this court and made a statement to the effect that the Defendant did not have any folishing the victim by assaulting or breaking the victim. However, when considering the overall contents and attitude of the E’s statement, the testimony of E is difficult to believe that it is difficult (E stated to the effect that he did not memory by drinking only at the time of the initial police investigation).

On the other hand, at the time of the police investigation, the victim stated to the effect that “the defendant was able to take a bath while resisting and resisting the drinking value,” and “the defendant was able to take a receipt by making the receipt, but the defendant reported immediately when he was able to do so.”

In light of the fact that the police was reported immediately at the time, and that the police was dispatched to the site, that the photograph No. 3 taken at the time corresponds to the statement of C, that at the time of the police investigation, the Defendant Macker also stated to the effect that C was the same as her from the call at the time of the police investigation. In light of the circumstances before and after the report of this case, C is the Defendant.