beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.10.28 2016고단323

특수협박등

Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principaled Defendants: (a) as the victim E, a resident of the same village, fixed a wire line and a iron fence to the wall of the victim’s residence located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, with the outer wall of the victim’s residence; and (b) as the so-called “ta-gu wall” accumulated, the victim was under dispute with the victim due to inconvenience in passage; (c) around April 8, 2015, the said “ta-gu wall” was laid down by using the improvement and cutting machine

At around 06:40 on April 8, 2015, Defendants were also in the vicinity of the above victim’s residence, Defendant A cut the wire ropes, cut the wire ropes, and Defendant B moved the iron with the cutting machine, and Defendant C moved the iron.

As a result, the Defendants jointly damaged the steel shed in the sum of market prices owned by the victims of approximately KRW 275,00,000, wire ropes, etc.

2. Defendant A

A. A. A Special Intimidation around 06:40 on April 8, 2015, at the vicinity of the victim E’s residence, the Defendant cited the victim’s right, which is a dangerous object against the victim’s harming “Tin wall” as above, in his/her hand, as the victim’s large interest, “hin, if he/she was to go to the Hando test,” and called “hin hin.h.,”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

B. Around 07:50 on April 8, 2015, the Defendant took a bath to the victim E who sits on the bar stairs in the victim’s residence, and was assaulted against the victim’s left leg by hand on his hand.

B. The Defendant causing property damage, at around 11:00 on July 8, 2014, was making it difficult to view that the victim E would not desire the Defendant to live in the Dong residents. On the road, the victim discovered the Defendant, who is the victim’s owner, was in a tax base return return, and the bicycle, who is the victim’s owner, was able to be able to receive the repair cost of the vehicle.