When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who has entered into a contract with B for business delegation concerning debt collection from October 5, 2009 to April 30, 2010 and has been engaged in debt collection business.

1. Fraud;

A. On October 15, 2009, the Defendant received a remittance of KRW 294,000 from the victim by putting a phone to the victim C, a creditor of a claim that the Defendant is responsible for collecting claims from the debtor D, who called “in order to collect a claim from the debtor D, the expenses are 294,00,000, and the expenses are paid.”

However, the Defendant was planning to consume the said money for his own personal expenses because of the absence of money.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the above KRW 294,00 from the victim.

B. (1) On December 10, 2009, the Defendant received 430,000 won from the victim by sending a phone to the victim E, who is a creditor of a claim that the Defendant is responsible for collecting claims from the debtor F, by sending the phone to the victim E, who is a creditor of the claim that the Defendant is responsible for collecting claims.

However, the Defendant was planning to consume the said money for his own personal expenses because of the absence of money.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the above 430,000 won from the victim.

B. On December 28, 2009, the Defendant was transferred KRW 1,050,000 from the victim by her phone to the above victim E, stating that “In order to collect a claim from the debtor G or H, the period of prescription should be extended, and KRW 525,000 per capita per person shall be sent 1,050,000 as litigation costs for extension of the period of prescription, etc.”

However, the Defendant was planning to consume the said money for his own personal expenses because of the absence of money.

The Defendant, as above, induces the victim to do so, shall be the victim.