However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 27, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of one million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court on the Incheon District Court.

At around 22:30 on June 20, 2020, the Defendant driven Erabs vehicle from the road near the Defendant’s residence located in Asan City B to the road front of the D cafeteria located in the same City, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.175% of alcohol concentration.

As a result, although the defendant had a record of punishment for drinking driving, he was driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of re-driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A circumstantial report on a drinking driver, a report on drinking or an investigation report on the mark of a drinking driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (attached to a summary order);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (a violation of Article 55 (1) 3);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution ( comprehensively taking into account the criminal records of the accused, the blood alcohol concentration, the background leading up to the drunk driving, the driving distance, etc.);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;