A. On November 29, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and was discharged from military service on August 28, 2013, and the Plaintiff had been discharged from military service on the date of maturity.

B. On July 10, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State with the different parts of the wound, claiming that “I am saves among the ice saves being saved in the training center, who was taking the same as the ice saves while taking the ice saves in the training center, and the conditions have deteriorated after being trained.

C. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) during the process of the application, the Defendant confirmed that “a sacratitis” and “brutitis” were “brutitis; (b) had a record of having been injured on the left-hand edge prior to ten (10) years in the entrance; and (c) “a sacratitis” were generated after six (6) months after an ordinary trauma; (b) the Plaintiff’s injury was confirmed on December 2012 after the injury on March 2012; and (c) it is difficult to deem that the injury was the direct cause of the above injury during the training; and (d) “a sacratitis infection” cannot be deemed as a temporary and short-term medical treatment due to a disease with limited action; and (e) a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the grounds that his/her symptoms can be cured due to a temporary, short-term treatment; and that there was no impairment in daily life.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The Plaintiff filed an objection, but the Defendant rendered a decision not to accept the objection on April 18, 2016.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff did not receive medical treatment due to the injury that occurred before entering the army. On December 26, 201, after entering the military, the Plaintiff continued to undergo training without proper medical treatment after taking a bridge against the franchisium and taking a bridge against the franchisium at the time of the new military training on December 26, 201, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “bronchisatitis” and “aftermathm franchisat.” Therefore, the above wounds are either persons of distinguished service to the State or persons of distinguished service to the State.