On April 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the hotel coffee shop in Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Pilotagedong, “In order to alleviate the unsold price in the city construction in relation to the D redevelopment business, the cost of attorney’s fees, etc. is required to be incurred in 50 million won in order to alleviate the unsold price in the city construction in relation to the D redevelopment business; and (b) borrowed KRW 50 million, the Defendant would sell a commercial building in lots and pay some of the principal and profits.

“A false representation was made.”

The victim immediately delivered five copies of the check to the defendant on the face of the 10 million foot.

However, in fact, the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged person as a personal purpose, such as repayment of his/her own debt, and did not intend to use the money for relaxation of measures to reduce the amount of unsold in lots for the project in relation to the project. Moreover, there was no intention or ability to repay the money to the injured person by failing to have the right to sell in lots within the project site, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged person due to the lack of any property held by

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was given KRW 50 million from the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and reasons for sentencing of imprisonment;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court Sentencing / [type] the basic area [the scope of the recommended punishment] in the category 1 (less than KRW 100 million) and the basic area [the scope of the recommended punishment] from June to June; and

2. The fact that most of the damage amounts to the Defendant appears to have not been recovered is that there is no record of criminal punishment against the Defendant under the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the decision of the sentence of this case, and that there is no record of criminal punishment.