When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the driver of the freezing train in D.

On June 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle as a job around 13:55 on June 20, 2014, and made a left-hand turn from the north-west side of the Incheon Seo-gu, the Defendant sent the vehicle signal to the right-hand side from the north-west side. On the road along the south-west side, the Defendant got the victim E (the age 61, n, n) who dried the above crosswalk to the Defendant’s freezing tower under the Defendant’s occupational negligence and caused the death of the victim at around 23:54 of the same month while treating the vehicle at the International Esung Hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which did not mean that the defendant's negligence was less severe than that of the defendant's death, even though the crime of this case was committed during the period of probation, considering the circumstances such as the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of probation, on the other hand, it is against the fact that the victim is covered by comprehensive insurance, that the victim's bereaved family is covered by comprehensive insurance, that there is no traffic-related penalty power other than once (200), and that there is no traffic-related punishment power other than the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment,