교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the court below (two years after the suspension of the execution of March and forty hours after the order to attend a law-abiding driving course) is too unreasonable in the gist of the grounds for appeal.
2. The Defendant recognized a mistake and opposed to the judgment of the court below, and agreed with the victim.
However, the defendant caused a traffic accident in violation of the traffic signal, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim is not easy.
In full view of the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the fact that there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the lower court after the crime, the lower court’s sentencing is not unfair.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.