beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.07.20 2015나11094

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 20, 1948, AK, the fleet of the Defendants, completed the registration of ownership transfer with the Changwon District Court No. 4029 received on June 1, 1948 on the grounds of sale and purchase of AC land and AD land.

B. On October 20, 1966, upon the death of AK on October 20, 1966, the wife succeeded jointly to the AR, AL (Noju), AM, andN land and AD land. As AR died on September 15, 1969, the status AL, AM, andN jointly succeeded to each of the above land.

As the AL died on September 13, 1985, the E, F, G (hoju), and H jointly inherited each of the above lands. As a result, the AL died on November 9, 2013, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, and Defendant H jointly inherited each of the above lands according to the inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet.

As AM died on August 15, 1983, Defendant I, Defendant J (Defenseju), Defendant K, Defendant L, Defendant L, and Defendant N jointly inherited each of the above lands according to the inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet.

The deceased on September 20, 2010, Defendant O, Defendant P, Defendant Q, Defendant R, and Defendant S jointly succeeded to each of the above lands according to the inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet.

C. As the Plaintiff’s attached AP dies on April 25, 1991, the Plaintiff was bequeathed of five parcels, including AP 3,302 square meters (hereinafter “AP land”) from the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and some of them constitute a boundary with AC.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 16, 17, 18, Eul evidence No. 7 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the claim for ownership transfer registration based on sale and purchase;

A. From around 1970 to around 1985, Q, the Plaintiff’s assertion, purchased AC land and AD land from the Defendants’ shipbuilding. The Plaintiff received legacy from Q Q to other land owned on March 11, 1991.

Therefore, the Defendants, as the successors of Q, are the Plaintiff, AC land and AD.