2. In full view of the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against himself and that there is no record of being punished for the same kind of crime as this case, but narcotics-related crimes need to be severe punishment as a serious crime with a high risk of social harm and recidivism; the sentence and equity determined in the crime similar to this case should be taken into account; the frequency and method of the instant penphone medication and other conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments, it is difficult to see that the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.