2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The plaintiffs are all representatives of child-care centers, and the plaintiffs are employers, and the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "F").

(2) After entering into an entrustment training contract with a workplace care teacher, a document prepared by the workplace care teacher meeting the requirements for the completion of the entrusted training to F and submitted to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea for compensating for the training expenses (Article 8 of the Employment Insurance Act, the Ministry of Employment and Labor shall attend at least 80% of the training hours and complete the training course.

[2] Specifically, Plaintiff A (E Child Care Center (hereinafter “G Child Care Center”) and D Child Care Center are operated at the same time from June 2, 2012 to July 22, 2013; five (5) infant care teachers belonging to E Child Care Center (one total number of 97), including E Child Care Teachers belonging to E Child Care Center from September 15, 2012 to October 2, 2013; three (2) infant care teachers belonging to D Child Care Center (one total number of 61 teachers per year) belonging to D Child Care Center; (3) the total number of 20 to 27, including Plaintiff B child care teachers belonging to E Child Care Center, and 27, including Plaintiff B (the representative of H Child Care Center) the total number of 10 to 27, including 27, 270, 271, respectively; and (3) the total number of 27, 271, 270, 271, respectively.

B. In the course of investigating F, which is an entrusted training institution, the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station prepared and issued a false commission contract and a tax invoice as if the business owner of 488 childcare centers, including the plaintiffs, did not advance pay training expenses, and is a trainee.