However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On November 23, 2013, at least 02:10, the Defendants introduced the Victim F (year 41) to the Esing room located in D3 stories, and divided the conversations. Defendant A asked the victim that “The victim was asked by the police officer about whether the victim was an illegal game site or not to operate an illegal game site.” The victim said that the victim was able to live in the flat of the Defendant and drink the face of the said Defendant.”

As such, Defendant A assessed the victim’s face and body face by drinking home, and Defendant B was unable to escape by attaching the victim’s body to avoid the victim’s occupation, and Defendant A assessed the victim’s body and the face side by drinking.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the right side of the victim and the body of margument, etc. which requires approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of suspect with regard to F;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes after capturing a photograph;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is against himself and deposits 6,00,000 won for the victim and that there is no power to punish the suspension of execution or more) of each Criminal Act;

1. The community service order (defendants) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;