사기등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On May 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution by fraud, etc. at Seoul Northern District Court on May 15, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 23, 2014.
When the Defendant and B borrowed money from Pyeongtaek over several occasions, but they were unable to borrow money any more thanks to the failure to repay it properly, they used D to borrow money from C and to divide it.
1. On March 2013, the Defendant and B engaged in the event of a private document forgery or the instant investigation document made D and a false lease contract in the “G teahouse,” operated by the Defendant in the vicinity of the F Station located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, with a view to having the Defendant possess KRW 4 million, KRW 4 million, KRW 4 million, and KRW 2 million.
D Around that time, at the I East capital branch located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, the head of the Dong capital branch voluntarily drafted a real estate lease agreement with the Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, with the content of “3 floors, the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lessee, D, and L of the lessor.
Around April 1, 2013, the Defendant and D and B borrowed money from “M multilateral” in the vicinity of the F Station and delivered the said real estate lease agreement to C who is aware of such fact.
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with D and B, forged a copy of the instant real estate lease agreement in the name of L, a private document on rights and obligations, which is a private document for the purpose of exercising money from D and B, and exercised it.
2. The defrauded and D, and B, around April 1, 2013, borrow money from the victim C in return for the lending of money from the victim on or around the same day. D’s false statement to the effect that, if the said real estate lease agreement was delivered to the victim as genuine, D would provide the victim with a right to claim the return of the deposit under the said agreement as security, and the Defendant and B are not only the persons with good credit for the victim as the head of the original group, but also lend money.