beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.26 2015나72292

대여금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the second 9th 9th 9th of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited as “Abandon”; and (b) the fourth 18th 19 and the 19th 19th mar are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of

2. The addition;

C. The Plaintiff is merely a juristic person established by the Defendant in a formal manner to acquire “Tourism” in Cambodia, the event of this case and the combination of the assets of the Defendant, and C, and in light of the situation where there is no manpower employed in the assets or ceremony, the Defendant abused the legal personality of the travel agency in this case or has been dissolved. Thus, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant’s obligation against the Plaintiff of the travel agency in this case is liable for repayment by the Defendant, who is the person behind it.

However, each evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize the above facts, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

The plaintiff's assertion on this part is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.