However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 27, 2016, at around 21:15, the Defendant: (a) received a report of 112 that a guest was locked at the C pharmacy located in Leecheon-si B, Leecheon-si; (b) the circumstances surrounding the affiliation of the D District of the Police Station D in thischeon-si Police Station D; and (c) the slopeF used the said F’s bridge to walk one time due to a string of the Defendant, who was kid by the said pharmacy, and assaulted the said E’s face one time by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [the scope of recommendation] The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: There is no basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] one year (a confession, reflective circumstance, etc.) of the suspension of execution of six months;